On the other hand, Caesar was cunning and cruel. He claimed that he always had Rome’s best interests in mind whatever action he took, and he ultimately made Rome a better place. Negative traits and condemnable actions of Caesar Caesar was said to have wept at the sight of Pompey’s head, saying that Pompey was a formidable rival and that he did not deserve such a death. When he arrived in Egypt after the Egyptians had killed his rival Pompey, the Egyptians brought Caesar the head of his old rival. He spent his time creating games such as lavish gladiator games and other forms of entertainment to keep the people happy, and he expanded the Roman Empire by nearly a third of its original size. On the one hand, Caesar always did his best to please the people of Rome. What Caesar did as a good leader to please Roman people Caesar was a bad leader because he did many things that were either cruel or for selfish reasons such as chieving support and rising in power in Rome. So many people have different opinions, and it is hard to say who is wrong and who is right. But there is one thing about Caesar that we don’t know for sure, and maybe we never will. These things we all know to be one hundred percent true. He was a friend to the people, but the senate saw him as a threat. He was the hero of Rome and the enemy of all that opposed it. Proud, ambitious, clever, cunning, strong-willed and minded, and charismatic. Is Julius Caesar really a hero? Gaius Julius Caesar had many traits. Conclusion: Comparison of Julius Caesar’s person from old and modern viewpoint.Negative traits and condemnable actions of Caesar.What Caesar did as a good leader to please Roman people.Introduction: Historical background of Julius Caesar’s times.Thesis Statement: Analysis and comparison of Julius Caesar’s character traits and actions from the ancient and modern points of view

Gaius julius caesar negatve atribbutes